Given that, I think we should view Commander One as a software aimed at the already skilled user. Here’s why I think that’s okay: Commander One is already targeting a subset of OS X users: if you’re looking for a file manager alternative, you’re probably not someone who is going to obsess about the numerous options or the use of ‘advanced’ terms like symlink or source/target. Along with those options, of course, comes increased UI complexity. Commander One is an attempt to address those missing features. Those comfortable at the terminal know that OS X, with its UNIX underpinnings, is much more powerful than its GUI cousin the Finder would have you believe. Power users across the world celebrate and vilify the Finder, both for being a flexible file manger and for being needlessly cut off at the knees. Let’s dig in and see what Commander One has to offer. Enter “ Commander One,” a dual-pane file manager that seeks to fill in the holes that the Finder has famously left. While replacing HFS+ remains out of our reach, an alternative to the Finder for day-to-day tasks has been achievable for some time. For all of the strengths of OS X, two of the complaints recycled year after year are the aged filesystem, HFS+, with its lack of file integrity, and the file manager, the Finder.
0 kommentar(er)
